Anyway, after giving it much consideration, I’ve decided to review something I read a few weeks ago: The Marlowe Papers by Ros Barber. A “novel in verse” about the playwright Christopher Marlowe, working off the premise that his death was staged and he spent the rest of his life in exile writing new plays as William Shakespeare.
I should probably mention that, not only do I have a degree in English literature, my focus was Early Modern (Shakespeare, Milton, and, yes, Marlowe). I am well acquainted with blank verse (unrhymed iambic pentameter), Marlowe himself, his plays, and the Shakespeare authorship debate.
Did I love this? No. But I did like it.
The verse itself is quite good, with really lovely use of language, and I enjoyed it on that level. However, the story is only moderately successful. Barber just didn’t do enough to make me believe the Marlowe theory. Supposedly, this was part of her PhD work, but I found it academically weak. Interesting, yes, but the scholarship isn’t concrete enough to persuade me that Marlowe was Shakespeare.
Which is unfortunate because I actually prefer Marlowe’s plays.
This is a book that I have trouble recommending. If you don’t like reading verse, you’ll struggle with it, and I suspect that it might be hard to follow if you aren’t already familiar with Marlowe as a historical figure. If, like me, you are keen on blank verse and this period, it’s worth a read. If only because it is something very different.